Perhaps the most important thing to remember about OPRA is that there is a very, very short statute of limitations period. This means that if you receive a denial, you need to act very quickly or you may lose your rights to gain access to the record you seek.
What do you do if you receive a denial from an agency or if the agency unlawfully redacts information from government records?
The best course of action is to immediately speak to an attorney, who can work with you to gain access to the records. This frequently requires a lawsuit filed in Superior Court. Again, the most important thing to remember is that your action must be filed within the statute of limitations, which is only 45 calendar days. The process for filing in Superior Court is as follows:
- You will sign a retainer agreement with an attorney, who will likely agree to represent you on a fee-shifting basis (meaning, there will be no charge to you–the agency will pay the fees if and when you prevail)
- A Verified Complaint and Order to Show Cause is filed. These will be drafted by the requestor’s attorney, though the requestor must sign the complaint to verify it is accurate.
- The judge will review and sign the order, which sets for a briefing schedule and a hearing date.
- The pleadings are then served upon the public agency and they will submit an opposition brief. Sometimes, an agency may opt to release the records and settle the attorney fee amount rather than proceed with the litigation.
- The requestor’s attorney has an opportunity to file a reply brief.
- A hearing is held, wherein the judge will hear arguments from both sides. For simple cases, the judge will usually enter a ruling that day. More complex cases may require a little more time for an opinion to issue. The requestor need not be present for the hearing.
- If the requestor is declared a prevailing party, the Court will order the agency to pay the requestor’s attorney fees.
Again, the most important thing to remember is that there is a very short timeline for filing the initial Verified Complaint – 45 days from the date your request was denied.
For more information about this blog post and challenging a denial of access, please contact email@example.com.
Posted in Articles, opra, Uncategorized
Tagged foia, nj opra attorney, opra, opra attorney, opra denial, opra denied, opra lawsuit, OPRA lawyers, public records, transparency
NJ Advance Media has written about the recent lawsuit we filed on behalf of Libertarians for Transparent Government seeking a settlement/separation agreement between Cumberland County and a corrections officer who allegedly had inappropriate relationships with inmates. The lawsuit also asks the Court to find that Cumberland County violated OPRA when it told Plaintiff that the corrections officer was “terminated for disciplinary reasons,” when the Pension Board’s meeting minutes state that he was allowed to “retire in good standing.”
PSWH partner CJ Griffin is quoted in the article:
Attorney CJ Griffin, representing the plaintiff, argued that the county has provided a distorted view of Ellis’ case.
“By indicating that Ellis had been terminated for a disciplinary infraction, it leads the public to believe that Ellis paid a price for his admitted misconduct,” the suit states, “In reality, according to the pension board’s minutes, Cumberland County instead allowed him to ‘retire in good standing.'”
The South Jersey Times also published an editorial on the case, arguing that settlement agreements with employees should never be confidential.
For more information on the lawsuit and to review the pleadings, visit John Paff’s “NJ Open Government Notes” blog.
For questions about OPRA, contact CJ Griffin at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Posted in jails, opra, OPRA Cases, Uncategorized
Tagged CJ Griffin, foia, freedom of information, government employees, misconduct, nj opra attorney, opra, opra attorney, opra denial, OPRA lawyers, public records, settlement agreements
Last week we discussed Exception 1 to OPRA’s personnel records exemption, which permits you to file an OPRA request for a public employee’s “name, title, position, salary, payroll record, length of service, date of separation and the reason therefor, and the amount and type of any pension received shall be a government record.” This week, we explore Exception 2.
Exception 2 provides that: “personnel or pension records of any individual shall be accessible when required to be disclosed by another law, when disclosure is essential to the performance of official duties of a person duly authorized by this State or the United States, or when authorized by an individual in interest.”
This Exception has been largely un-litigated and thus the Courts have still not defined the scope of this exception. In McGee v. Twp. of E. Amwell, 416 N.J. Super. 602, 616, 7 A.3d 785, 793 (App. Div. 2010), the Appellate Division held that emails about an employee were “personnel records” even though they were not filed in a personnel folder and that Exception 2 would permit the employee to request them because she would be an “individual in interest” who could authorize the release.
Regarding the phrase, “personnel or pension records of any individual shall be accessible when required to be disclosed by another law,” we will explore this portion of Exception 2 next week when we explore Exception 3 because the two exceptions work closely together in some instances.
For more information about this blog post or any other OPRA question, please contact email@example.com.
Posted in Articles, OPRA Cases
Tagged access to records, CJ Griffin, Exception 2 to OPRA, OPRA examples, OPRA exemption, OPRA lawyers, OPRA personnel records, opra records, Pashman Stein, personnel records